Chaos in The Republican Party

October 4th, 2023 by Ray Tercek

https://truthsocial.com/@PPB_GPD32/111173796896948861/embed

Historical Conspiracy investigations

October 5th, 2021 by Ray Tercek

Refer back to my post August 2019.
https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/kash-patel-john-durham-russia-investigation-fbi/2021/10/04/id/1038995/

‘Institutional racism’ among police? Let’s look at the numbers By Andrew McCarthy Published June 04, 2020, National Review

June 4th, 2020 by Ray Tercek

About twice as many white people as black people are killed by police. In fact, in about 75 percent of police shootings, the decedent is not black. Of course, that is not what you would grasp from consuming media.

Take the website statista.com, specifically its breathless focus on “Hate crime in the United States” — counterfactually insinuating that any shooting involving a black victim must be a “hate crime.” Here’s their big headline from Tuesday: “Black Americans 2.5X More Likely Than Whites to Be Killed By Police.”

It is fiction. It is sheer demagoguery, peddled as American cities are besieged by rioters in the wake of George Floyd’s killing by Minneapolis police.

The falsity of the claim is demonstrated even by statista.com itself. Just three days ago, the site posted another series of bar graphs, showing that, in fact, whites are nearly twice as likely as blacks to be shot to death by police.

Here are the numbers:

Year White Black
2017 457 223

2018 399 209

2019 370 235

2020 42 31 (so far)

The rest of the bar graphs break out the numbers of Hispanic decedents (slightly lower than black, significantly lower than white), as well as those whose heritage is described as “other” and unknown.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/institutional-racism-among-police-examine-numbers-andrew-mccarthy.

Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at the National Review Institute and a contributing editor of National Review. @andrewcmccarthy

So, past is prologue! Revisiting a 2017 Facebook post

June 4th, 2020 by Ray Tercek

The Investigation of Pepe Chavez Et Al (series)
September 12, 2017 ·
Readers, remember the Portland Police Bureau (Oregon) Special Investigations Division (SID) scandal of the late ‘70s/ early ‘80s? (Vol 1. Chapter 3. Pages 19-23) From my perspective, the United States Department of Justice is in a similar situation as was Portland Police Bureau (Oregon) back then. The similarities: In 1980, administrators in PPB and the Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office heard wind of potential corruption within some units of the SID narcotics unit. Now in 2016/2017, administrators in the US Executive Branch and the DOJ have wind of potential corruption in the FBI. In 1981, PPB and MCDA were faced with the dilemma of pursuing the rumors with full understanding discovery of corruption would diminish the effectiveness, trust, and operations of the narcotics unit for years to come. Reorganization and reforming to re-establish operations and repair trust would be a formidable task, all at risk of losing years of effective narcotics enforcement while the organizational changes are planned and implemented. In 1981 PPB and the District Attorney fears materialized. The powers went after the corruption; it took years to recover.

Now, in 2016/2017 there are real signs that the FBI was complicit in the corruption of the Obama administration—certainly complicit in conspiracy with Hillary Clinton. The President, the Executive Branch and the DOJ now face tough decisions. I hope they do the right thing.

Consequences: Years of fake news liberal new reports and subsequent liberal politician patronizing legislation vs policing philosophies/ strategies

June 3rd, 2020 by Ray Tercek

My thoughts: Yes, police racial prejudice exists. But where? As I see it, racial prejudice has been isolated today to deviant police individuals vs police institutions, as it has been thought historically. That should be recognized as an America success. Well not so.

So what is the poison that continues to enable individual deviant police officers to be hired and consequently act out their prejudice?

Here it is: 1) In the past twenty years, liberal federal, state and local politicians have lowered, ideologically influenced and malformed hiring, promotional and training standards. 2) In the past twenty years liberal federal, state and local politicians have for all intents and purposes indifferently dwindled recruiting, training, and promotional budgets.